Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Setyo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Shawn Setyo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--NL19931993 (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as meeting WP:GNG based on the sources. No indication nom did a before on any of the Green Party leaders they AFD'd. ミラP 00:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete while there was the usual, routine press coverage of his candidacy - stood for a minor party; lost - there is no notability here.NotButtigieg (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- @NotButtigieg: WP:ROUTINE already was shown not to apply to people. ミラP 20:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Following the link you provided leads to WP:POLITICIAN, which make clear that political figures who have not held one of a number of specified offices need to have gotten "significant coverage" in the media. Setyo has not gotten such coverage.NotButtigieg (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- @NotButtigieg: WP:ROUTINE already was shown not to apply to people. ミラP 20:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete provincial party leaders are not default notable, and no other claim to notability exists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Johnpacklambert: If they clear WP:GNG they are. ミラP 20:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Too many people misinterpret GNG for me to trust most attempts to say someone is passing it. Almost every local politician would pass some readings of GNG, but we do not keep articles on every local politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Johnpacklambert: If they clear WP:GNG they are. ミラP 20:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete In agreement with John Pack Lambert, there is no other claim to notability. Plus, given the Sask Green Party's current record, I think you could argue he is the leader of a minor party. Sources might be interpreted as meeting GNG but they're pretty standard for any political candidate. TheAnayalator (talk) 02:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.